So I was just checking my mail for an update from my english teacher (is my research topic approved or what??!!) when I noticed a gmail feature I'd never heard of before. Spreadsheets. Spreadsheets you can share with specific other people on gmail. Way neat. Sounds like a good way to do my checkbook, since hubby and I have a joint account for paying bills and we never use our checkbook register. For years, I have been using Works Spreadsheet or Microsoft Excel for my register because I hate the ones that come with the checkbook. I make too many mistakes, and I love SORTING!!! This year, the whole year, I just didn't do it. Wow. I left for Florida last January and now the year is almost over, wow. Anyway he always ended up never helping with it, never adding his things like when he pays the cable bill or transfers cash to his personal spending account. (We both have one, we both get the same amount each month, don't act like I'm the money-meanie wife.) Maybe this will help. Starting next year of course. Or maybe this November. I dunno.
Topic topic topic is my research topic approved??!?!?!?!?!?
So, this is the topic I sent her:
Should there be more restrictions on who gets fertility treatments and how they are performed, in order to ensure healthy births and promote adoption?
And this was the response:
I don't think it would be ethical to limit such a thing. If they can afford it, (it's very expensive and often doesn't 'take' the first few times) then it should be their choice. And I'm sure women have to meet certain health requirements now before they're approved for treatment. Is there perhaps another spin you could put on it?
So I said:
That's just the thing, in England they are having a big argument over restricting fertility treatments to women who are overweight. They are basically saying they can do it, but it won't be free like it is for 'healthy' people. Critics are saying its the first step in government only allowing those they see fit to reproduce. Eugenics and all that. I could draw from studies on health problems in children whose mothers are obese.
For something that applies more to the US, there are ways to prevent those extreme multiple pregnancies before the egg is even fertilized. Somehow the clinics get better ratings because of the increased number of babies born instead of the number of healthy births, so they don't want to encourage patients to take those precautions.
I think it can work, maybe if I forget about the adoption angle and stick with fertility treatments.
That was on Friday, and her I am at Sunday night and no response. I'm going to take this as a yes, because there is an assignment due tomorrow that depends on finding studies for the topic. I have to work tomorrow, so I have to go ahead with what I've got. I guess its too bad if she doesn't like it.
You have an unhealthly love for spreadsheets. That sounds like an interesting topic to look into. I'm amazed that fertility treatments are covered in England. Still, that pisses me off that they're making fat women pay for it. Granted even losing 10% body weight can increase fertility but still.
ReplyDeleteShouldn't they be focusing more on parent education for the people that do have children? Hey let's pay for this healthy bitch to pop out a kid but if she's abusive and ruins her childs self esteem, we don't care. Nice.
Posted by Amanda on September 24, 2006 - Sunday at 10:46 PM